We're often asked (by customers and sales people) how the different VDI Connection Brokers compare to eachother. One of my colleagues (Ken Davidson) & I have created a Connection Broker Comparison Document that attempts to provide an honest comparison of VMware View 3.0, XenDesktop 3.0 and Quest vWorkspace 6.0. We're interested in feedback from the community to make sure that we're accurately portraying the feature set of our competitors, so please let us know if there are corrections to be made. We also know that there are many other connection brokers on the market, and new ones seem to pop-up every couple of months. Others of note are Leostream, 2X, Ericom, Qumranet, Panologic, [insert any number of other vendors here]... Our document was created to compare Quest vs the competition, as defined by the customers we visit. If I start getting lots of requests for information on another vendor, I'll consider expanding the document.
Download the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Connection Broker Comparison here: Quest Connection Broker Comparison
This document was updated in September 2009 to reflect the features of VMware View 3.1, Quest vWorkspace 6.2 and XenDesktop 3.1.
Download the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Connection Broker Comparison here: Quest Connection Broker Comparison
This document was updated in September 2009 to reflect the features of VMware View 3.1, Quest vWorkspace 6.2 and XenDesktop 3.1.
